Suspicious Observers, Youtubers who analyze space weather and other interesting phenomena, captured electricity in an experiment they conducted. The Youtube clip can be seen here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRy6DPx-5Fc&feature=c4-overview&list=UUTiL1q9YbrVam5nP2xzFTWQ
I was struck by the resemblance to the 'spiderweb' phenomena seen on the TEPCO cam:
There were also smudges of red color on the TEPCO cam that were rather disconcerting looking and cannot be explained by 'raindrops' on the lens
Please see my screen shots here
https://www.dropbox.com/s/gc2oq1fba9qxyfk/February%2014-15%202014.pdf
Majia,
ReplyDeleteDid you see the link Chargedbarticle posted on the Enenews webcam forum of the CNN report of a web effect in a Florida pool? http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2013/08/09/dnt-ufo-in-florida-pool.wbbh.html
Horse
http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2012/11/13/co-ufo-sightings-in-denver.kdvr.html
ReplyDeleteSorry, got it right the first time. Hard to edit in this little box. The CNN video shows the same light show we see at south tepcam. I am not yet convinced what the webs are or aren’t and continue to gather evidence. Watching the webs and guessing what they might be is more fun than watching for a smoke event or another wisp of steam from r3.
ReplyDeleteHorse
The red smudges on the screen might be the red of the cranes blurred by water droplets IMO. I put up a video on the enenews wecam forum, trying to catch the timing of the site lights and webs. While watching before the light show I noticed how the driving rain blurred the red of the cranes into nearby areas. https://www.dropbox.com/s/9dpx3rtgehc9zyw/2-15-2014%201645%20jst.avi
ReplyDeleteHorse
I thought it possible too, until recent revelations concerning Gamma-shine & beta & x-ray levels at the site.
Deletehttp://enenews.com/gundersen-new-development-at-fukushima-entire-plant-has-a-gamma-ray-haze-over-it-a-haze-of-radioactive-particles-tepco-its-impossible-to-stop-using-mroe-shielding-wont-help-audio
Those extra electrons have to be building up and periodically discharging, it would seem.
As for what the exact phenomenon or mechanism is, i don't know. What i do know is that we are not given all of the facts (not your fault though, Majia).
The gas light comes on at 17:08 jst about 23 minutes in. At 31 mins in the webs start. My capture has the webs starting after the lights start coming on.
ReplyDeleteEven if we can get proof the site lights are not causing the webs, what theory to account for the lights? Radiation affecting the ccd cameras? I've gathered info on ccd cameras but they don't show the webs as a known distortion.
The webs are brighter this year than last, but there are more site lights. The site would glow brighter at night than it did last year as seen on the other cams. I would not use the webs or glows as proof of higher emissions.
Horse
I appreciate your careful analysis. This is exactly what we need. Please continue watching and posting your observations.
DeleteI've seen some effects that I think are rain drops and then some effects that move oddly and don't seem to be on the lens.
The display I posted above was persuasive.
I think better evidence of the ongoing emission events at the plant can be found here
https://www.dropbox.com/s/o95wsoc1sf6k3ks/Feb%2018%202014%20B.pdf